Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. The Defendant, who works as the employee of “C” located in Cheongju-si, was living together in the Defendant’s residence located in the E detached Housing E-F in Cheongju-si from around December 2018 to the victim D (n, 39 years of age) and December 2018.
Defendant from around February 11, 2019 to around February 6, 2019
2. From 03:51 to 03:2, the above subparagraph F, and the Defendant’s female ties with each other, assaulted the victim’s right eye and part of the part of the upper part of the upper part of the right eye, thereby causing injury to the victim, and thereby caused the victim’s death at the emergency room of the He Hospital located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju, Seoul, by means of an influencous means.
2. Determination
A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial lies on the prosecutor, and the finding of guilt must be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected of guilty, even if there is no such evidence.
Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.
(See Supreme Court Decision 201Do7261 Decided November 10, 2011). B.
Considering the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, it is difficult to readily conclude that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, as stated in the facts charged, inflicted an injury on the victim and caused the victim’s death, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.
1) During the time indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant and the victim met with the victim’s happiness) around 10:54 on February 6, 2019, the Defendant and the victim arrive at the Cheongdong-gu E detached Housing Fba and beauty art room at around 10:56, and the victim headed at the beauty art room at around 11:20.