logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.06.24 2016고단1495
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 1, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused before the risk) driving a B-learning car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.126% from the blood of around 00:05, and made the two-lane road ahead of the intersection of the steel mountain zone located in the iron rupture at the high side at the speed of about 40km from the speed of the steel mountain parallel at the speed of about two lanes.

At the time, it was difficult to set up at night, and there was a duty of care to safely drive the steering in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes while living well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the defendant.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this while under the influence of alcohol and violated the signals of the front stop and turn to the left as it is, due to negligence, the defendant's driving of the victim C(44 )'s driving DaM5 car, which was straight to the right right by the top of the due diligence, was driven by the defendant as the front part of the above car operated by the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as catum cat, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical care due to occupational negligence in driving a normal driving due to influence of drinking, and injury, such as “the first cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat cat c

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) was driven by the Defendant at a distance of about 2 km from the front day of the mutual influence fluence to the front day of the iron fluence, which is located in the iron fluence, in light of the foregoing, while under the influence of alcohol on the day set forth in paragraph 1, to the front day of the iron fluence, in light of light.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. The survey report on the actual condition, the report on the actual condition of the driving at home.

arrow