Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

around May 2007, the defendant is the husband and wife who was married with the victim B(here, 44 years old)(here, 207).

On July 2, 2019, around 08:30, at the front parking lot of the Cheongju-si, the Defendant discovered that the victim and the victim were on board the vehicle owned by the victim in order to work in order to find out the fact that the victim did not contact with the victim and that the victim was on board the vehicle, the victim's ownership, and operated the E-verification XD, a dangerous object, and received the front wheel part of the above O-topba, the front wheel part.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim with dangerous objects, and at the same time destroyed the front spread of the victim's vehicle so that the market is influent repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (on-site CCTV image data);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 261, 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of special violence and the selection of fines) and Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of causing special property damage and the selection of fines) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of damage, age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. of the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and consequence of the crime, even though considering that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, it does not seem that the punishment of the summary order is too heavy. Thus, the sentence shall be determined as identical to the summary order.