The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following, the summary of the grounds for appeal: (a) the instant accident was minor; (b) the Defendant issued a written order to the victims; and (c) the Defendant requested the J to handle an accident immediately after the accident and subsequently took necessary measures to the J, the Defendant could not be deemed to have escaped; (d) the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts that led to the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The Defendant also made the same assertion in the lower court, and the lower court considered the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, namely, ① the speed of the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident, the degree of damage to the damaged vehicle, and the degree of the collision between the damaged vehicle and the middle part of the crosswalk due to the collision, the degree of the collision was insignificant.

It is difficult to see that the victims complained of pains at the time of the police investigation conducted immediately after the traffic accident. ② The victims complained of pains at the time of the police investigation conducted immediately after the traffic accident, and that they immediately visited the hospital and received considerable medical treatment as permitted in their respective circumstances, ③ there is no warning that the victims suffered injury to the defendant at the time, but there was no fact that they made a statement to the effect that rescue measures need to be taken actively, ④ there was no particular non-products due to the traffic accident in this case. However, the location of the accident seems to have occurred. However, the location of the accident was the first round of the two lanes immediately before the intersection, and the defendant left the scene rapidly by righting the vehicle on the road in the same way as the scene of the accident. At the time of the defendant leaving the scene, the victims were at the time of the accident, using the same vehicle as the defendant, and the defendant's vehicle was at the entrance of the intersection through the same line.