A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 23:40 on July 2, 2013, the Defendant operated a BKan-Pack vehicle and continued to use the Sacam village apartment distance from the original surface to the two-round surface of the road. In such a case, a driver of an automobile has a duty of care to look at the front side and right side of the vehicle and to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system and prevent accidents from occurring. However, the Defendant failed to perform his duty of care to care to prevent the accident from occurring, the Defendant’s 3rd-down of the victim C's high-speed passenger vehicle in the front direction of the vehicle in the front direction of the vehicle in the front direction of the vehicle in the front direction of the vehicle in the front direction of the 1st half of the vehicle in the front direction of the vehicle in the middle direction of the 1st half of the vehicle in the middle direction of the 1st 3rd 8th Kacam and the above 9th Kacam in the middle part of the 8th Kacam in the front direction of the 9th 2nd Ka.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in E and G;

1. Application of the actual condition survey report, on-site photographs, each medical certificate, and written estimate under the statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of not taking measures after each destruction at the time of the market);

1. Each of the crimes listed in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code.