1. The Defendant’s disposition of site payment for the employment maintenance support payment against the Plaintiff on November 7, 2017 is revoked.

2...

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is a corporation, the purpose of which is to manufacture, sell, export, etc. And has its head office in Geum-gu, Busan, and the factory 7 (hereinafter referred to as the "factory of this case") in Geum-gu, Busan, and Seoul, Gangnam-gu and 15 (hereinafter referred to as the "factory of this case"), respectively.

On July 25, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) suspended the instant factory from August 1, 2017 to August 31, 2017; and (b) ordered the Defendant to take employment measures to pay paid leave workers of the instant factory from August 1, 2017 to the date of temporary bankruptcy; and (c) specified the relevant workplace as the instant factory (workplace management number: E: location of the instant plant: Busan FF) by stating the period of employment maintenance (22 days) from August 1, 2017 to August 31, 2018; (b) stating that “the period of employment maintenance (22 days); (c) the number of persons subject to employment maintenance would pay the instant factory workers; and (d) basic pay, weekly leave allowances, job allowances, etc. as the instant factory workers; and (d) submitted a report on the plan (hereinafter “report on the plan for employment maintenance measures”).

After implementing measures to maintain employment for the instant factory in accordance with the report on the plan for employment maintenance measures in this case, the Plaintiff applied for payment to the Defendant on September 28, 2017, by 68,117,010 won multiplied by 1/2 of the total amount of money and valuables paid to workers for the preservation of wage during the period of employment maintenance measures as above, 141,28,742 won, multiplied by 1/2 of the support rate of 1/2.17,010 won.

In this regard, the Defendant confirmed that G was retired from office on September 1, 2017 at the Plaintiff’s Seoul Branch on September 21, 2017 by J, K on September 18, 2017 by the Plaintiff’s head office, and on September 18, 2017 by the Plaintiff’s head office (hereinafter “G, etc.”), and on November 7, 2017, the Plaintiff did not leave the insured through employment adjustment under Article 19 of the Enforcement Decree of the Employment Insurance Act for the period of employment maintenance measures and for one (1) months thereafter.