A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 16, 2017, at around 23:45, the Defendant 49, the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dudro 46, a 49-ro divers, and the Defendant diversed the bottled fals of the sick.

“I, upon receipt of the 112 report, notify that the person was called out after receiving the 112 report from the slope D belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station C District D, the Seoul Western Police Station, “I,” and “I, upon receipt of any self-declaration, reported.”

“A person who assaults D’s body in a sound body and with D’s body,” and “a person shall die in the police ... inside.”

In this mosa, this mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa mosa

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mobile phone pictures;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the same Act / [the scope of punishment] There is no person who does not [the person who is subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and six months) / [the decision of sentence] 8 months of imprisonment, suspension of execution 2 years of suspension of execution, observation of protection, the defendant's obstruction of performance of public duties and violence for 120 hours in the community service order, even though there are several times, it is not good that the defendant again leads to the crime in this case, but it is confession and contradictory, and there are no favorable circumstances, such as the fact that there is no criminal record heavier than the fine, and that there is no treatment related to alcohol.