Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2014고정565] 피고인은 2012. 9. 9. 17:30경 고양시 덕양구 B에 있는 피해자 C가 운영하는 ‘D’ 음식점에서, 술에 취하여 피해자와 손님들에게 “이런 씨발년, 개새끼야, 씹새끼, 좃새끼, 병신, 내가 발로 한번 차볼까”라고 큰소리로 욕설을 하는 등 위력으로 약 1시간 20분 동안 피해자의 위 식당 운영업무를 방해하였다.

[2014 High Court Decision 566]

1. Around 13:54 on May 26, 2012, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) walked the victim’s “G” restaurant operated by the victim F of the victim F in Gyeyang-gu, Soyang-gu; (b) without good cause, the Defendant expressed the victim the victim’s “emulsion, such as whether he/she is married,” and (c) expressed the victim’s “emulsion,” that the 20 middle group male head of the 20st group of the meals at the Dong-gu office, who was a male head of the 5th group of the 20th group of male head of the 5th group of the meals at the Dong-gu office, and expressed the victim’s “the 5th class of the 5th group of young head, who was inside the me, died; and (d) led the victim to disap with the restaurant by force.

2. The Defendant, as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food cost at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, by deceiving the Victim F as if he had the intention or ability to pay the price, and then, he, by taking the victim’s crypted disease and the cryped-in disease by receiving the amount of 21,000 won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement [2014 High Court Decision 565] Case record

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Records of the H’s statement of reference [2014 high-level 566] Case

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Articles 314(1) and 347(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and Article 347(1) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the selection of each fine for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.