logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.05.12 2014가합55588
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Presumed factual basis

A. The Defendant’s establishment E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) is a company established around February 2008 for the purpose of real estate sales agency business, construction execution business, etc. and actually operated by F.

F) On June 23, 2010, F established the Defendant, a business entity (SPC) with the aim of securing project funds necessary for the purchase and construction of land in order to jointly implement the projects on the ground (hereinafter referred to as “instant commercial building”) such as building 4, 5, 6, 7, H, 3, 5, 5, and 6, Namyang-si, I, J (Change to M and N after K and L block) and I, J (hereinafter referred to as “instant commercial building”).

B. On March 16, 2010 and May 12, 2010, E entered into an agreement to implement a joint project with each G Building Association on the construction of commercial buildings, which is implemented on the site for living in the O neighborhood. 2) On May 25, 2010, E entered into a joint project implementation agreement with the association with 1,3,5, and 6 cooperatives on the joint operation agreement on the new construction project (the content that the joint project is implemented as a joint implementation company under this joint implementation agreement) between the association and 1,3,5, and 6 cooperatives on May 25, 2010.

C. On June 23, 2010, E entered into a “execution, asset management, and service contract” with the Defendant and O commercial building construction project with a view to carrying out business affairs related to the implementation and asset management at the monthly service charge of KRW 30 million.

On February 24, 2012, Plaintiff B’s offer, investment, and loan agreement 1) Plaintiff B made an investment offer to sell the commercial building of this case to the Defendant (as the Defendant agreed to sell a newly built neighborhood living facility to the Plaintiff, the purpose is to smoothly convert the contract into the original sale contract according to lawful sale procedures under the Act on Sale of Buildings or the relevant statutes, and on the same day E and KRW 31 million.

arrow