A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On December 29, 2015, the Defendant kept and possessed a disposable injection equipment, which is a local mental medicine, in C Kafa-gu Mayang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, B, about 0.07g of Meba-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A copy of the statement by the police and the prosecutor's office against the defendant (a list 2, 3);

1. A report on internal investigation (voluntary submission, etc. of a disposable injection instrument);

1. A report on investigation (attaching an appraisal report on narcotics);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (calculated an additional collection charge);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (excluding a fine imposed for a relatively old crime of violence, taking into account the fact that there are no previous crimes of the same kind and no previous crimes of the same kind, and the circumstances of the possession of a mera

1. The portion not guilty of the proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates a "C Ka Pa Pa P" store in Ansan-gu B in Ansan-gu, and D visits the said establishment.

On December 29, 2015, the Defendant reported that D provided the Defendant with an injection device containing approximately 0.07 g of mecopical drugs at the 1st team of the Police Station Mayang Manncheon-gu, a local mental medicine, and that D was detained on February 5, 2016 for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence), and that D was finally affirmed at the appellate court on October 22, 2016.

A. On December 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) took a disposable injection device at the 1 team office of the police station located within the limit of KRW 63,000,000,000 air f3,00,000,000,000,000, and (b) found “D is necessary to report once a drug is a drug,” and (c) sees that “D is stuffed in the vehicle if it is necessary for it to report it to be a drug.”

(b).