1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assaulting among the facts charged in the instant case is acquitted.

The acquittal portion

1. On July 18, 2012, around 02:35, the Defendant argued that the Defendant expressed a desire to the Victim G, who is a driving employee of F, in front of the Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and that he was faced with the part of the victim’s left upper part of the victim’s hand by avoiding the victim’s tightly harming the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant suffered bodily injury such as having the victim suffer the upper part of the left elbow part of the treatment days.

2. There is a statement in F, G, and H investigative agencies and courts as evidence that the Defendant committed assault against G as described in the facts charged.

However, I witness the case at the time before the beginning and reported to the police as a witness in this court. ① At the time when the defendant was unilaterally assaulted by F, G, and H, the defendant did not have any satisfing or satisfing off the body of women, ② there was no person satfing the defendant's body, ② there was no person satfling the defendant's body, ③ there was a report to the police, ③ at the time of the defendant's unilateral being exposed to the defendant, ③ at the time of the call to the scene, the police was called as a witness in this court, and ④ At the time of the call to the scene, the police was called as a witness in this court, and ④ At the time, the two women satfling the scene were assaulted by F and him, and ⑤ even though the defendant's son was not found to have been unable to find external damage, the defendant did not have any other part of his satisf's statement because he did not have any other part of the facts charged.