A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant related to the public conflict case (F’s complaint) was a person who, from May 2008, promoted the business of domestic and foreign monopoly supply of Malaysia bread from around G (Korean name H, hereinafter “G”), I, F, etc., and was in a hostile relationship with G and I with F due to the refund of investment funds from around July 2008, and was in a hostile relationship with F, and there was no other person who concluded a contract with F to take over J company from the F.

On July 15, 2008, the Defendant, at the J office in Gangnam-gu Seoul, contacted with G to the above location, cut F into the above location, and argued the issue of F and the return of investment deposits in that place, and the F will drive away from F, and recorded the F’s handbag of 30 minutes per hour and 30 minutes per hour by the Bosciscois.

Since then, F filed a complaint with the Defendant and G in relation to the above case, and the Defendant was subject to a disposition of unguilty suspicion, and against G, a public prosecution was instituted for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (public conflicts) around June 30, 2009. Around July 10, 2009, the Defendant sent G to G in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, stating that “The facts were recorded in the situation at the time,” and voluntarily stated that “F returned the investment amount to G rather than due to the conflict of G, and voluntarily stated that “F returned the investment amount.” At that time, the Defendant sent the said recorded materials to G by editing them in one-hour amount of time.”

On September 15, 2009, the Defendant continued to appear and take an oath in the Seoul Central District Court No. 502 (Seoul Central District Court 2009Dahap758) as a witness, and testified. - The Defendant answer to the question of “I would not know that I would not know that I would have any prior commitment to F would have been made to the witness’s office.” - The Defendant (G) asked the question of “I would not know that I would have any prior commitment to F would have been made to the witness’s office.”