All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fine of 2 million won is imposed on Defendant A, Defendant B, D, E, and F) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of Defendant D, E, and F are the first criminal without criminal records; Defendant A was not subject to criminal punishment in addition to the disposition of suspension of sentence for a crime of dual species; Defendant B did not have the previous criminal records; Defendant B did not have the previous criminal records; and the Defendants recognized the instant crime and reflect it in the trial.

However, the crime of this case prevents the smooth progress of a housing redevelopment project by organizing a resident representatives' meeting at will without the approval of the defendants, and the nature of the crime is not less severe, but the defendant A has damaged the reputation of others by pointing out false facts, and did not receive a letter from the victim. In addition, considering various sentencing conditions such as the defendants' age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, degree of damage, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.