All of the Prosecutor and the Defendants’ appeals are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Each sentence (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unhued and unreasonable.

B. Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. We also examine the prosecutor’s judgment and the Defendants’ assertion.

The defendants recognized each of the crimes of this case and divided their mistakes, the amount of benefits they acquired does not exceed the amount of fraud as stated in the judgment below, and the defendant B participated in the crime of this case in the course of receiving the money that he borrowed to the defendant A, and there are circumstances to consider the circumstances, and the defendant A has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine.

However, the crime of this case is a case where the Defendants were directly involved in the manipulation of domestic professional sports or received information about the manipulation of the winning game, and then acquired large-amount dividends from the victims by using it. The crime of this case is a case where the Defendants interfered with the sound implementation of the business of issuing sports promotion voting rights, thereby causing significant harm to the general public in society, the amount of the lottery tickets purchased by the Defendants is significant, and the degree of the Defendants’ participation in the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be negligible. Defendant B committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case even during the period of repeated crime.

In addition, considering the following factors: the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, motive and background leading up to the instant crime, the means and consequence thereof, and the circumstances after the instant crime, all of the sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and arguments on the changes, each sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendants is deemed appropriate.

Therefore, the prosecutor and the defendants' above arguments are without merit.

3. Thus, the prosecutor and the defendants' appeal are justified.