logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.24 2015나2213
손해배상
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of each corresponding part as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance

[Attachment] On the 7th page of the first instance judgment, “A prosecutor and the Defendant appeal to the said prosecutor and the said appellate court is currently underway” in the 7th page 10 through 11 of the said first instance judgment, “A prosecutor and the Defendant appealed to the said prosecutor and the Defendant, but all of which was dismissed (U.S. District Court 2015No617), and the Defendant’s appeal is currently pending in the final appeal (Supreme Court 2015Do13978).”

Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance court is "each entry of the evidence of heading A1 through 26 (including each number)," and the statement of heading A1 through 26 and heading B(including each number) are "each entry of heading A through 17 (including each number)."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow