logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.02.14 2013고합308
살인
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for twelve years.

One (Evidence No. 8) and one (Evidence No. 9) shall be confiscated, respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Around September 2012, the Defendant and the victim were notified of dismissal on the grounds that the victim transferred the pertinent private teaching institute to another private teaching institute on the ground that the victim transferred the said institute to the said other private teaching institute, and that he/she received a certificate of retirement from around June 7, 2013, the Defendant and the victim would receive the transfer of the said private teaching institute from the victim.

2. Around July 2013, the Defendant and the victim agreed to ensure 40 million won for key money, 33 million won for key money, 20 million won for building, and 1.5 million won for each subject of English and academic education, while taking over 2 points of the said FF educational institute from the victim, and the Defendant agreed to ensure 40 persons for each subject of English and academic education.

After the Defendant acquired the above private teaching institute, the number of school students per subject does not exceed 40, and the instructors with the above F2 points also the above F2 points have caused trouble in the operation of the private teaching institute by transferring the same to one point operated by the victim, etc. at the wind.

From the end of August 2013, the Defendant, at the end of this year, was asked by the victim to not use the signboard called the above FFF FF FF Private Teaching Institutes No. 2 on the ground that it could cause confusion with the above FF Private Teaching Institutes No. 1 when the Defendant used the signboard as the above FF Private Teaching Institutes No. 2, which led to the victim’s demand not to use the signboard called the above FF Private Teaching Institutes No. 2, and thus, the victim cannot use the signboard because it differs from the first contract.” However, the victim neglected the demand and continued to use the

3. On October 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a H X-Trak vehicle from the G apartment in Ulsan-gu G apartment in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) demanded the victim to solve the problem of using the signboard of a private teaching institute and implementing the terms and conditions of the acquisition of a private teaching institute; and (c) if not, the Defendant would murder the victim.

arrow