logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.17 2015나33493
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B is the representative director of the Dispute Resolution (hereinafter “D”) and Defendant C also the joint representative director of D from April 2010.

The Plaintiff, as the victim of the Defendant’s crime, was acting as the representative of the creditors of the case in the Chungcheong E Apartment Group (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On July 27, 2007, Defendant B was prosecuted for fraud, etc. on July 27, 2007 at the Seoul Central District Court (2007 senior 4117, 4794, 6027, 6237, 703, 2008 senior group 661, 3129, 3546, 4735). On January 8, 2009, the above court sentenced Defendant B to the Seoul Central District Court (209.29.29.3 years of imprisonment, etc., even if the apartment was completed by discounting the ownership of the apartment to the purchaser, it was eventually sentenced to 200 years of imprisonment with prison labor, etc., and 209.3 years of sale of the apartment, which became final and conclusive by deceiving the victims from the Seoul Central District Court (209.3 years of imprisonment with prison labor, etc.).

(hereinafter “instant criminal procedure”). C.

The facts pertaining to the instant case shall be organized in the order of time.

Done on August 28, 2008, between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B, the “transfer agreement angle” was drawn up.

(B) No. 3-1). The content is that Defendant B takes various measures for the recovery of damage to the claim group, and the Plaintiff voluntarily pays the amount of debt to the victims by transferring the rights to the claim group B to the claim group council by the D representative director B.

arrow