The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) was the victim C (man, 45 years of age) and internal-related persons; (b) around 09:40 on September 13, 2013, at the E-office of the Defendant’s operation located in Gwangju Mine-gu, the Defendant sought from the victim “Yhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

2. As evidence that the Defendant, after putting the shoulder of C over the floor, took 3-4 times the body by its launch, there is a statement in C’s legal and investigative agencies and an injury diagnosis document.

However, there is no consistency in C's statements in the court and the investigative agency.

On the other hand, C's legal statement states that C was waiting to leave the office of the defendant, and C was waiting to leave the office of the defendant, after getting on the cab and going to the office of the defendant, and he was waiting to leave the office of the defendant, and he was waiting to leave the office of the defendant. According to the records, C can be recognized the fact that C was staying in the office of the defendant, even until the police was called upon receiving a report after having arrived at the defendant's office, and it is difficult to see that C was waiting to leave the office of the defendant.

The statement made by C to the investigation agency is the date and time stated in the facts charged, which is not consistent with the objective situation or difficult to obtain by social norms.