Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 15:10 on August 31, 2012, the Korean Democratic Trade Union Federation held the Seoul East-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Resolution on the Action of the Republic of Korea War.

At around 15:13 of the same day, there are about 6,00 members belonging to the National Construction Union Federation, the National Metal Trade Union, and the National Chemical Franchis Federation, which are affiliated with the Seoul Central Assembly Federation, and about 15:13 of the same day, respectively, occupy two lanes in the direction of progress from the Seoul YTN square to the sub-specing of sub-specing, while moving into two lanes in the direction of progress from the Seoul YTN, the two lanes in the direction of progress were moving into the YTN.

On the same day, the Defendant participated in the 16:20th of the same day in the Round-ro-ro, and completed a prior assembly at the Pool-si, and led to the traffic of vehicles by holding a reorganization meeting from 17:40 to 17:40 by holding a reorganization meeting in the vicinity of the subway-ro zone, while the number of participants in the meeting increases to approximately 8,800 persons among the members belonging to the members, such as the National Federation of Public Transport and Trade Unions of Korea, which are linked to Bro-roin-ro in front of the subway-ro zone, as the number of participants increases to approximately 8,800 persons.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic on land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic materials of an assembly inventor;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant could not recognize the illegality of the assembly as a simple participant in the assembly. Since there was no illegal act under the Act on Assembly and Demonstration, it does not constitute the elements of the crime of interference with general traffic, or the illegality is excluded.