beta
Text
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge is not guilty. The summary of the acquittal part in the judgment is publicly announced.
In this case.
Reasons
Part of innocence (Infliction of Injury)
1. On September 4, 2017, the summary of this part of the facts charged charged: (a) on the grounds that the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and (b) based on D, with his hand, carried the Defendant’s timbered with C, thereby damaging C in excess of the floor for about two weeks, thereby causing injury to C, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the judgment of the court below is not sufficient to acknowledge the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.
① In the first written statement, C as to the details of the damage “if the Defendant gets a label late at night while the S.C. was punished.”
On the other hand, the body was sealed by hand, stating that the body was hacker (D) Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do
However, from the police station, C’s statement was not consistent to the purport that “the Defendant first left D and reported to the police as soon as possible,” and the Defendant’s statement was reversed to the effect that “The Defendant was sealed by hand and exceeded the floor.”
② Unlike the statement made in an investigative agency, D also stated in this court that “A himself/herself was not directly deemed as having a criminal defendant C and may have been pushed down to himself/herself.” Therefore, in light of the content of the above statement, it is difficult to believe that D’s investigative agency and this court’s partial statement to the effect that it conforms to the facts charged, and as well as that it is difficult to believe that C’s investigative agency and this court’s statement made in this court are in accord with the facts charged ( rather than C).