A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 15, 2015, at around 01:17, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by saying, “I would like to have a fluench to be arrested as a flagrant offender from the victim F, a situation leading to the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station E district unit of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station, after receiving a report from the Defendant that the Defendant had not paid the drinking value, at around 01:17, the Defendant was working in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu., the Defendant: (a) the victim, among the above D and his employees, who had a fluench group G in the same district group where he was called together, “I would flue the fluench, why I would flue the inside, why I would flue the face, why I would flue the face flue flue the face flue,” while there are five other police officers working in the said D, G and E district.

2. On January 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender at the office of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong Police Station Edistrict office; and (b) continuously took the place to the office of the said district office; and (c) assaulted the disturbance by the Defendant, as a defect, an slope I belonging to the said district unit of the said district unit of the police station of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; and (d) continuously took the place to the said district office.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and investigation by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Considering that there is no past or past criminal record, and that there is no past record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine);

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] Performance of Official Duties shall be type 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties).