logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.11 2019고단3747
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 21, 2019, at the front of the “C Hospital” in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on May 21, 2019, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by stating that “The victim D, a police officer, who was dispatched after having received the 112 report that “the taxi driver and the Silf had occurred”, would be bad to deal with the reported case on the ground that it was 10 passengers and citizens on the name of the taxi operator and citizens on the ground that it would be bad to deal with the reported case.”

2. At around 01:10 on May 21, 2019, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) at the F District District of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Police Station, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) at the time when G, the husband of the Defendant, was arrested as a flagrant offender and was frighted to the earth to wear a locker; (c) while continuing to set a port, the process was taken on a cell phone located in the earth; and (d) the Defendant saw the cell phone that was located in the earth in the earth; and (d) caused the above cell phone to fall off on the floor by making it difficult to repair costs of KRW 103,00,000.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

3. The Defendant committed an assault on the ground that the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), and on the ground that the police officer belonging to the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station, prevented the Defendant from damaging the cellular phone indicated in paragraph (2), by asking the front part of the above H’s face on several occasions, and opened the h’s right part, such as opening the h’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H and D;

1. A complaint;

1. Polyphones of studios, damaged part photographs, and damaged parts' photographs;

1. A CCTV closure image and a visual closure photograph;

1. Application of the written estimate Acts and subordinate statutes

arrow