1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The cited judgment of the court of first instance, excluding the conclusion among the reasons to be stated in this case, is identical to the part pertaining to the plaintiff and the defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the addition or dismissal as set forth in the following Paragraph 2, and thus, it shall be quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. In the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part after being used is as follows: [Public 1-3], [Public 1-4], [Public 1-5], [Public 1-6], [Public 1-7], [Public 1-8], [Public 1-9], [Public 5-1], [Public 6-4], [Public 6-6], ] [Public 6-6], and ] as a result of sharing the part in common, the part is as indicated in the “a list of corrected prices reflected” as attached to this court.

The defendant Public Official Pension Service (hereinafter only referred to as the "Defendant Public Official Pension Service") in Part 3 of the first instance judgment shall be dismissed from "Defendant Public Official Pension Service" to "Defendant", and "Defendant Public Official Pension Service" in the reasoning of the first instance judgment shall be dismissed from "Defendant Public Official Pension Service" to "Defendant".

Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) in Part 3 of the first instance judgment is dismissed as Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”), and Defendant B, in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, appears to be both the Intervenor B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Intervenor B”).

On the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant joining the defendant (hereinafter referred to as "the intervenor") in the 11 and 12th part of the judgment is dismissed as "the intervenor joining the defendant (hereinafter referred to as "the intervenor C")" and the defendant joining the defendant C corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the intervenor") in the reasoning of the judgment of first instance is both dismissed as "the intervenor C".

"Defendants" in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, including Chapter 4 of the judgment of the first instance, are all described as "Defendants and intervenors B".

In the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, the votes of the first to the first to the second to the second to the second to fifth to all shall be followed as follows:

South Korea remains.

The general aggregate table of the cost of repairs recognized by the first instance court is as follows, but this court accepted the defendant's assertion on the part of the cost of the first instance as follows.