Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 6, 2015, Defendant A: (a) around 05:11, 205, Defendant A: (b) committed theft by means of transporting waste telecommunications cables with a large amount of 70 km off to return it to the airport construction, the ordering site after the replacement of telecommunications lines in the process of remodeling at the domestic airport of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Aviation Investigation Committee for Airport 1373, and then, (c) during the 30 instances from around June 9, 2015 to around September 6, 2015, Defendant A, who was in charge of the construction of telecommunications facilities at the Kimpo Airport, Ltd., Ltd., a victim of A&C, was in the aggregate market price of 2,265,570 won, and 242g of telecommunications cables over the total market price of 30 times, as in the list of crimes (1) in the same manner as in attached Table 30 minutes.

2. Defendant A’s violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Motor Vehicles Act is the owner of a vehicle of 1 ton in the name of Gosung-help Co., Ltd.

On September 6, 2015, the Defendant operated the said vehicle from 22:00 to 10km after the Gangseo-gu Airport Aviation Investigation Committee of Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul. On September 6, 2015, at around 05:11, the Defendant operated the said vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the police with regard to G and H;

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure, and records and photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and choice of imprisonment or imprisonment;

1. Articles 37 and 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the crime of larceny in this case falls under the category 1 in the sentencing guidelines, and the scope of the recommended punishment falls under the category 4 months to 8 months in imprisonment, even though the victim did not agree with the victim, the certain amount of money deposited, and Defendant A has symptoms of being able to make an old-old loss and support the disabled children.