logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2013.04.04 2012가합19
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The defendant, except the plaintiff A and B, stated in the "personal amount" column of the attached Table 2 calculation sheet to the plaintiffs, respectively, and the same.

Reasons

.8.83 + 17.85 + 7.24.5 + 17.5 + 29.5 + 29.5 + 29.5 + 19.25 + 48.5 + 29 + 19.65 + 46.5 + 18.46.5 + 29 + 48.6.45 + 68.6.45 + 16.65 + 68.6.45 + 7.46.65 + 16.65 per unit (196.46.7) per unit) size of the apartment of this case.

Therefore, the Defendant may be deemed to have obtained unjust enrichment as much as the amount exceeding the amount stated in the “justifiable sale price” column of the attached calculation sheet 2.

(1) Standard building cost for each household (including costs less than KRW 7,090,022,70 ± Total sale area 88,509.105 ± sale area for each household 】 (3) sale area for each household 】 interest rate of KRW 1,276,204,086 (=interest rate of KRW 7,090,022,700 x annual interest rate of KRW 3.6% x rental period of 5 years) 】 total sale area of each household 】 (4) lease period.

arrow