logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.03 2015구합64603
부가가치세부과처분취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 7, 2013, Plaintiff A purchased KRW 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, and 306 from KRW 2,893, 781,00 in total sales price, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its name on which Plaintiff A purchased KRW 109, 110 from KRW 681,50,00 in total sales price, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its name on June 7, 2013, Plaintiff B purchased KRW 10 from KRW 681,50,00 in total sales price.

(hereinafter the plaintiffs purchased the above commercial buildings (hereinafter "the commercial buildings of this case"). B.

Plaintiff

A filed an application for early refund of each value-added tax, on May 31, 2013, with the value of supply 2,893,781,00 won of the tax invoice issued in the name of C when filing the first value-added tax on May 31, 2013 as the input tax amount, and Plaintiff B filed an application for early refund of each value-added tax, with the value of supply 980,760,000 won of the tax invoice issued in the name of C when filing the first value-added tax on

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant tax invoices” in addition to each tax invoice issued in C.

However, the Defendant deemed that C had repaid the obligation to pay the construction price to D as the instant commercial buildings, and determined that D supplied not only by C as the supplier of each of the instant tax invoices, but also by D.

Accordingly, the Defendant issued a revised notice of KRW 16,122,100, and KRW 9,807,600 to the Plaintiff, respectively, as the value-added tax for December 16, 2013, on the ground that each of the instant tax invoices was a false tax invoice by the supplier, without deducting the supply value of each of the said tax invoices as an input tax amount, on the ground that it is a false tax invoice by the supplier.

(hereinafter “each disposition of this case”). (c)

The Plaintiffs filed a petition with the Tax Tribunal for the revocation of each of the instant dispositions on July 14, 2014 upon filing an objection on March 3, 2014, but filed a petition for adjudication on July 14, 2015.

arrow