beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2017 Highest 2734] The Defendant, around August 12, 2016, suffered from the victim D’s house located in the Namyang-gun C, Namyang-gun, Seoul around August 12, 2016, “an adequate intrusion exists.”
It is suggested that "Ar. I will deliver 4 million won to the victim immediately if I suggest that "Ar. I will do so, as Ir. I will do so. I will do so," and I will suggest that "Ar. I will deliver 4 million won to Ir. I will like to say that Ir. will live in Gyeongnam-gun, Busan-gun, the victim's Har. will live in 7.5 million won and that Ir. Ir. will see that Ir. Ir. will deliver it immediately.
“.....”
However, at the time, the Defendant did not pay 170 million won in bad credit while running his business, and was thought not only to have any property or income but also to be used for other purposes, such as repayment of debts or construction cost, etc. with money from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to send the brus to the victim.
Nevertheless, on August 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred KRW 4 million to a corporate bank account in the name of F, the Defendant’s child on August 16, 2016.
[2018 Highest 182]
1. On August 29, 2017, the Defendant would provide the victim H with KRW 450,000 per day on the site of the Housing Corporation located in Gwangju Mine G, and KRW 55-60,00 per day on August 29, 201, the Defendant would provide the victim H with KRW 450,000 per day on the site of the Housing Corporation located in Gwangju Mine G.
“At the time of September 13, 2017, the victim had the victim do c,355,000 won in total from September 13, 2017, from that time to September 13, 2017.
However, the Defendant, while running a business without any particular property or income, was unable to repay the debt up to KRW 170 million due to the failure to repay the debt, and the financial situation was difficult to the extent that it would be bad credit, and since the Defendant used the construction cost received from the owner for other purposes, it did not have to be able to fully repay the construction cost.
This is the defendant.