A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On July 22, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime on July 22, 2015, at the mutual influent restaurant in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the Defendant is a victim C’s second Marar’s son.

Therefore, it received approximately KRW 6 billion building in Asia and the shares of KRW 200,000,000,000,000 as a miscarriage, and a few of the two stories buildings in bucheons.

However, the shares and buildings, and the bank balance 96 million won held by the taxpayer was seized because the taxpayer did not pay the inheritance tax to the taxpayer instead of receiving less property but did not perform it.

Therefore, in order to select and resolve attorneys-at-law and certified tax accountants, it will be paid in one month if the principal lends 15 million won to the ASEAN hospital, such as the cost of appointment and the cost of living for the principal to go to the ASEAN hospital.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any property inherited, lives with the help of the siblings without any special property or income, and even if he borrowed money from another person and borrowed money from the person who did not repay the money due to fraud, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

On July 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received from the victim, a sum of KRW 9.5 million, including KRW 5 million, from the restaurant that is F in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul; and (c) KRW 15 million.

B. On July 30, 2015, the Defendant, who committed the crime on July 30, 2015, calls the said victim for a phone call from the said victim to “G” to borrow and repay money.

If only KRW 13.5 million can be solved, it will be repaid in one month prior to the loan.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the above even if he borrowed money from the damaged person for the above reasons.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and his deceivings the victim under the name of H immediately from the victim.