beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. On January 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 09:20 on January 20, 2017, at C and D court parking lots; (b) expressed the desire to remove the Defendant from E and F, a staff member of D court’s security team of the D court; and (c) according to each legal statement of E and E, the time when the Defendant took a bath appears to be after the Defendant was urged by the said witness to avoid disturbance; (d) it appears that there is no risk that the Defendant would be any disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense, and that the criminal facts are corrected ex officio without any changes to the indictment.
In his hand, he assaulted E and F faces, chins, and breasts several times, thereby hindering legitimate execution of duties concerning the security of office buildings of court officials.
2. At around 17:04 on March 27, 2017, the Defendant 2017, “(2114), along with a scambling engine at the front side of G and H National Police Agency, and heard that he might cause a traffic accident from a superior police officer of the said National Police Agency, who was working for traffic control, during the crosswalk at the crosswalk, and told I to move I to the sidewalk on the risk of the occurrence of a traffic accident. As such, I assault I of the part of I’s right mouth with the knife bar (120cm in length) that was blicked by her hand while carrying out a hambling theory, such as “nick or hick.”
As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties on guard and traffic control of auxiliary police officers.
Summary of Evidence
[Judgment 1] Facts 1, 2017 Highest 405]
1. Each legal statement of the witness E and F (a detailed statement of the above witness at this Court can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant assaults E and F as stated in this part of the facts charged and interferes with legitimate execution of duties of court officials in relation to the security of government office buildings);
1. Written Statement;
1. A photograph of the victim's part of the injury [the facts of the judgment No. 2, the second order of 2017, the second order of 2114];
1. According to the witness I's legal statement (the above witness's statement in this court), the defendant has a large access to the vehicle.