Defendant

A Imprisonment of 2 months, Defendant B and C shall be sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment, Defendant D and E shall be subject to a fine of 3,00,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Youngcheon District Court’s Young-gu branch on September 27, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 19, 2017.

[2] Defendant A is a person who was engaged in the I’s post-high school interest as a volunteer at the I’s election campaign headquarters in a local election on June 4, 2014, and Defendant B and C was engaged in an I’s election campaign on June 4, 2014 as Defendant A.

Defendant D is a person who has been operating a survey company from around December 2013 to J of Gangwon with the trade name of K, and Defendant E is a person who has obtained a certificate of qualification for a survey and topographical information special level technician in light of around 1999.

Defendant

A, B, and C, using a friendly relationship with I, request the public officials in charge of L Gun contracts to select the companies recommended by Defendant A as the contracting party with respect to the supply contract of materials related to the construction works ordered by L Gun, and when the above contract is concluded, they had the intent to request the above companies to provide and receive money and valuables in the name of the commission in return for the contract mediation.

1. On February 2016, Defendant B violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in Defendant A and B (EA player) is aware of the business that Defendant A gave rise to the need for water tank supply as a government-funded material in the construction work ordered by LA at a time due to an election campaign that is carried out by the Defendant A around February 2, 2016. If Defendant B is aware of the business and pays a fee, it will be said that the business is done.

Accordingly, the phrase "to allow the company to be selected as the delivery contract party" was heard.

Defendant

B Around that time, a water tank supplier (State) who became aware of through the Internet search at an infinite location by phone call to N, and “A supply contract may be concluded as there is a person who knows L Gun Office, and the design company may also draw up a service contract, and the fee may be reduced to a few percent.

“The” shall be asked.