logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.11.24 2014고단2212 (1)
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) on June 28, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 28, 2012, but the said suspended sentence was revoked on July 16, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court on January 29, 2014.

In addition, on December 22, 2009 and May 19, 2010, the Defendant received juvenile protective disposition as a special larceny, and on August 9, 2013, on August 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million as a punishment for larceny.

[2014 Highest 2212]

1. Around July 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stolen 18 smartphones worth 9,980,000 won in total market price from around that time to August 26, 2014, as shown in the List of Crimes (I) in attached Form 2, as shown in the List of Crimes (I) from around that time, the Defendant habitually stolen 18 smartphones worth 9,980,000 won in total of market price by the same method over 20 times, using the gaps in which surveillance by the victim F was neglected by taking advantage of the gap in surveillance by the victim F.

2. The Defendant’s fraud using computers, etc. does not require the input of personal information, such as resident registration numbers, etc., by the method of claiming information usage fees provided by Addrid app, “Tstong”, “Stong”, and “Gugmp”, etc., and the Defendant also does not require the input of personal information, such as fees, from among the purchase fees paid in advance by the purchaser, after having installed the game display case by accessing the app to the apptong, which was known at the brokerage site, by using the fact that the owner of the mobile phone used by the owner of the mobile phone who is not the nominal owner of the game access, who was charged with the mobile phone charges for the following month of the mobile phone that was used by the owner of the mobile phone who was not the nominal owner of the game access, and connected the app to the app to the said game by the purchaser at the request of the purchaser.

arrow