logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.03.27 2020고단264
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

On May 17, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul East District Court for the crime of interference with business, and completed the execution of the above punishment in the Seoul East District Court on October 15, 2019.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant, from around 03:10 on December 7, 2019 to around 04:10 on the same day, hereinafter “D” used at the convenience store operated by the victim C (60 years of age) in Songpa-gu Seoul (Seoul) from around 03:10 on December 7, 2019 to around 04:10 on the same day, hereinafter “D”, without any justifiable reason, she has to keep the victim at the police station without calculating the subject of lawsuit. The Defendant opened the bag before calculating the subject of lawsuit, after calculating the subject of lawsuit, after calculating the subject of lawsuit, she opened the envelope before calculating the unit, she opened the envelope without calculating the subject of lawsuit, and opened the envelope, without calculating the subject of lawsuit in front of the calculated unit, she opened it twice in two times with the victim’s left shoulder, and obstructed the victim’s business of operating convenience stores for about 30 minutes by force at the same time.

2. On January 21, 2020, the Defendant committed the crime from around 15:37 to 16:15 of the same day, and obstructed the victim’s convenience store operation business for about 30 minutes by force by force, such as: (a) from the convenience store operated by the victim F (n, 29 years of age) of Songpa-gu to “G” in Songpa-gu Seoul, the victim cannot be identified; (b) intending to open the alcohol and boom, without counting the alcohol and boom; (c) reporting the sound or threatening to other customers who were in the said place; (d) reporting the voice or threatening to other customers; and (e) allowing them to return to the convenience store operation for about 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement concerning C and F;

1. A investigative report (CCTV analysis, CD 1, photograph 31, and each victim's intent to punish);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of whether repeated offenses are repeated, current status of confinement of individuals, judgment, etc.);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense

arrow