logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018. 10. 17. 선고 2018누38965 판결
주식상장에 따른 이익에 따른 증여의 과세요건을 충족되어 적법한 처분임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2017Guhap62976 ( October 25, 2018)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2015Do4094 ( October 20, 2017)

Title

due to the fulfillment of the taxation requirement of a gift under the interest of stock listing, the

Summary

It is recognized that the requirements for taxation of the donation of profits from the listing of stocks or equity shares are satisfied, and there are no other circumstances to deem otherwise, and the Enforcement Decree, which provides that the largest shareholder shall be subject to the evaluation of the listing marginal profits, does not exceed the limit of the delegation scope.

Related statutes

Article 41-3 (Donation of Profits Accruing from Listing of Stocks or Equity Shares, etc.)

Cases

2018Nu38965

Plaintiff and appellant

PAA et al.

Defendant, Appellant

Head of the District Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2017Guhap62976 decided January 25, 2018

Conclusion of Pleadings

August 13, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

October 17, 2018

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked. The defendant 20 x. 】. 】. 】. The disposition rejecting correction of the gift tax on the plaintiff ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○, and the disposition rejecting correction of the gift tax against the plaintiff ○○○○○○○○○.

Reasons

1. Quotation and revision of judgment of the first instance;

The reason why the court is used for this case is that the "Plaintiff" of No. 7 of the first instance court's 7th judgment is dismissed as "Plaintiff PriorA", and the 11th 1th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th.).

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in entirety.

arrow