A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assault against the victim C is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for criminal fraud at the Daegu District Court on April 18, 2017 and two years for a suspended sentence of two years for criminal fraud

9.1. The above judgment becomes final and conclusive and is still under the suspension of execution.

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 6, 2018, the Defendant, around 01:5, 201: (a) boarded the victim C (56) seated on the back seat of the Dognam University Hospital located in Yong-gu, Namnam University Hospital located in Namnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 6, 2018; (b) on the back seat of the Dognam University Hospital located in 17-0 (17-0 (17-0), and on the same day, the Defendant conspired that the Defendant would arrive at a place different from his/her destination; and (c) assaulted the victim, who is a driver of a vehicle operating one stop to the right side of the victim, on one occasion, by misunderstanding that the Defendant would have arrived at a place different from his/her destination; and (d) assaulting the victim, who is a driver of a vehicle operating one stop.

2. On March 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) refused to request the identification from the head of the police station G and the head of the police station of the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station to the police officer dispatched in the state of seeing the defense; (b) provided a bath to the police officer who was called out in the state of seeing the defense; and (c) provided a bath to the police officer who was demanded the identification from G on the part of the head of the police station of the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station at the same time as the 112-Gu, Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, upon receiving the notification of 112 taxi engineers C; and (d) received the confirmation of the identity from G on the part of the head of the police station at the same time, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the report at one time at the

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and C;

1. Photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Application of a reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, etc., printed matter of the Daegu District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 6541, Daegu District Court Decision 2017No1684, and text printed matter of the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the occupation of a driver's assault) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;