The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged C (ju) started the construction work of apartment in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D around the beginning of the construction work of apartment in early 2012 and generated dust and noise from the construction work. The occupants of the E apartment in the vicinity thereof have been engaged in demonstration in front of the said construction site one to two times a month from September 2012.

At around 12:30 on November 9, 2012, the Defendant, as a resident of the foregoing E, went through a demonstration as above in front of the said construction site, and came to the inside of the construction site after passing through the regular door, was prevented from entering the victim F (70 years of age) who is a security guard at the said construction site, and the victim’s shoulder was confirmed by hand to go beyond the ground floor, thereby causing the victim to inflict an injury on the victim, such as the right-side bed, the right-side bed, the electromagnetic bed, the electromagnetic bed, etc., for which 12 weeks medical treatment is required.

2. Defendant’s assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion is large and large sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sized sizeds and north sizeds, which the Defendant was able to see on the ground and to see them toward the chests, and the victim was slided on the ground floor.

B. There is only the victim's statement as evidence corresponding to the facts charged of the instant case.

Witness

Of G’s legal statement, part of the part that the defendant was pushed down by some residents is merely a specialized evidence and cannot be used as evidence.

However, the victim made a statement in the police that "the defendant who was fluent in large sized sized or large sized sized drums and tried to enter the fluorily, so that the defendant tried to sing down his house, and sing down his house strongly, and the victim sing off the front of the defendant, and the defendant made a statement as if the victim followed the victim. However, this court stated that the defendant was sing back into the mixed fluor, and that the defendant was sing down, and that the defendant was sing back and sing down his house.