Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
260,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.
1. On November 29, 2014, the Defendant administered philophones by inserting approximately 0.05g of psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection machine, in a farm toilet for D operation in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and inserting crophones as soon as possible by inserting approximately 0.05g of psychotropic drugs into a single-use injection machine, and melting crophones into one’s arms.
2. At the same day, the Defendant: (a) provided the Defendant’s passenger car parked behind the Felon located behind the Felon E at the same time on the same day to G (the indictment of detention on December 11, 2014) with approximately 0.2g of the penphones without compensation; and (b) received and delivered the penphones.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination concerning G (No. 3, 4, and 8 in the evidence list);
1. Requests for appraisal and reports on requests for appraisal;
1. Report on the calculation of an additional collection charge;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing requests for appraisal;
1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) (Article 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. and Selection of Imprisonment with labor) concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and (2), and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is that the defendant has the same kind of criminal punishment at one time of the same sentence (2001) and twice of the same suspended sentence (193 and 2012), and the crime of this case is a crime during the period of suspended execution (the defendant is sentenced to one year of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution due to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on May 3, 2012) that is administered and possessed by him/her during the period of suspended execution (the defendant is sentenced to one year of suspended execution and three years of suspended execution). The consideration of all the conditions for sentencing, including the quantity of penphones administered