logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.13 2015나109414
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff National Health Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff Corporation") is a non-profit public-service corporation established to manage and operate health insurance for the prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment, and rehabilitation of diseases and injury of the people, childbirth and death, and improvement of health under the National Health Insurance Act, and A is a national health insurance policyholder of the plaintiff Corporation.

The Geumnam-high speed Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul-high speed”) is the operator of the express bus B owned by him (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”), and the Defendant is the mutual aid business operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with the Geumnam-high speed with respect to the instant vehicle.

On July 5, 2012, C, who is an employee of the Geumnam High-speed in the instant vehicle, was driving the instant vehicle on July 15, 2015, and driving the instant vehicle on July 5, 2012, and driving the two-lanes of the four-lane road in the Seo-gu Daejeon District, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, with the 3-lane 4-lanes in the area of orchard.

On the other hand, the front right part of the HH Driving's G new-learning car, which is in the atmosphere of the running direction, is turned back to the central line, and the front right part of the HH Driving's G new-learning car, which is in the front right part of the vehicle in this case, continued to cross the central line and continued to cross the central line, turned down the front right part of the HH Driving's I Lone Star Royman, which is driving one lane in the opposite direction while driving the vehicle in this case, with the duty of care to reduce speed and drive the front side in a safe manner. In such a case, C, while neglecting his duty of care to safely drive the front side of the vehicle in this case, was found to be in the front right part of the rear part of the vehicle in this case. In addition, the front right part of the HH Driving Driving Ga, which is driving with three-lane, was turned back to the front right part of the vehicle in this case.

hereinafter referred to as "the case."

arrow