Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul Administrative Court 2010Guhap4041 ( December 24, 2010)
Title
Whether title trust shares can be seen as title trust shares
Summary
(As in the judgment of the first instance court) The fact that the beneficial shareholder has submitted a confirmation document that he held the shares in the title trust as the next name, and there is no financial transaction statement indicating the payment of shares at the time of the acquisition of shares, and thus constitutes the title trust shares.
Cases
2011Nu4208 Revocation of Disposition of Levying Gift Tax
Plaintiff and appellant
KimA
Defendant, Appellant
The director of the tax office.
Judgment of the first instance court
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Guhap40441 decided December 24, 2010
Conclusion of Pleadings
June 22, 2011
Imposition of Judgment
August 17, 2011
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The decision of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke each disposition of imposition of gift tax of KRW 27,154,400 (including additional tax), and KRW 26,337,320 (including additional tax) against the plaintiff on August 3, 2009.
Reasons
1. cite the judgment of the first instance;
The reason why this Court is to use in this case is "fact" following the fifth fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance, : 6) The addition of "no material exists to deem that the plaintiff exercised shareholder's rights, such as the lack of financial transaction details that the plaintiff received dividends as a shareholder of BB engineering," and "no evidence exists to reverse the above recognition on a monthly basis" is the same as the reason of the judgment of the court of first instance except that "no evidence exists to reverse the above recognition by itself" is "no evidence to reverse the above recognition by itself". It is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Plaintiff
The appeal is dismissed.