logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.08.25 2016가단28255
소유권보존등기 등 말소등기절차이행
Text

1. As to the land listed in the attached list 2 attached hereto to the Plaintiff, Defendant Republic of Korea shall make a Macheon District Court Macheon Registry, 1996.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. Although the Plaintiff’s prior purchaser I was assessed on each land listed in the separate sheet, registration of preservation of ownership and registration of transfer of ownership were completed in the name of the Defendants.

B. On October 20, 1949, I died and succeeded to the property solely by J in her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son on April 14, 1954, the J succeeded to the property solely, and on September 18, 1995, K died and jointly succeeded to his son’s son’s son and his son’s son’s son’s son’s her son

C. Therefore, the registration of ownership of Non-party M, which was completed as of January 31, 1964 on the land listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and the registration of ownership transfer of Non-party M, which was completed as of March 18, 2010 by the same registry office as of January 31, 1964, and as of March 18, 2010, the registration of ownership transfer of the Republic of Korea completed as of October 9, 1996 as of the land listed in the separate list No. 28864 of the same registry office, the registration of ownership preservation of the Republic of Korea completed as of September 3, 1963 as of the land listed in the same list No. 3849 of the same registry office, and the registration of ownership preservation of the Republic of Korea completed as of November 10, 2015 as of the land listed in the same list No. 45161 of the same registry office, and each of the Defendants’ respective registration offices completed as of the same list No. 38585.

2. Determination

A. Since there is no evidence that determination I on each of the lands listed in the separate sheet 1, 4, and 6 found that each of the above lands was inspected, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant Korea, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H with respect to each of the above lands is without merit without further review.

B. The fact of recognition (1) as to each land listed in the separate sheet 2 and 3 is as follows: (1) according to the Gancheon-gun National Forest Survey Report prepared around 1921 by the former Joseon Forest Survey Order, O with the domicile in the same Ri is as 7 U.S. Report before P.

arrow