logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(인천) 2020.12.18 2020나12019
유치권존재확인
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment except for the dismissal as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, the summary and the attached Form are included under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The highest portion of the judgment of the first instance was donated “B” and the ownership transfer registration was completed in H’s name.

“B” submitted by the Plaintiff “(1)” in the first instance court and the first instance court, 4th 7th 4th 7th 6th 6th 6th 8th 6th 6th 6

I, and J, of the first instance judgment No. 4, 18, "I," and "I and J, at the time of "B, have been the owner of the land of this case".

The registration of "B" entering the five pages 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to "B".

5 pages 11 of the first instance judgment against L, M, and Y by K, a creditor of “B”, “B”, “B”.

In the first instance judgment, the phrase “B” subject to 5 pages 21 of the first instance judgment is followed.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow