Gwangju High Court 2013Na10535 ( October 23, 2013)

Since the disposition of seizure by the plaintiff is legitimate, the defendant must comply with the collection.

Since the agreement of the defendant that was made after the attachment disposition by the plaintiff is null and void against the validity of the attachment, the defendant shall comply with the plaintiff's claim for the collection of the attachment

Article 41 of the National Tax Collection Act (Procedures for Attachment of Claims)

2013Da216839 Collections

Korea

Yellow AA

Gwangju High Court 2013Na10535 ( October 23, 2013)

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The judgment of the court below and the appellate brief all of the records of this case, but the appellant's ground of appeal is not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or it is recognized that there is no reason. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by