Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a police official, and a person who serves as a staff member of the DNA Team of the former Ganpo Police Station.
On July 16, 2016, at the office of the Southern Police Station D Team at the time when the defendant and the National Police Agency met with 7 members, including the police officers belonging to the defendant and the E National Police Agency, the defendant was asked about whether he or she was aware of the case of G CCTV from the above F. The defendant did not make any effort to confirm any fact about the victim H's influence related questions between police officers in the south area at the time, and conducted an investigation into the CCTV at the time when he or she met with the light of the direction of the above G and the light of the light of the light of the light of the light of the light of the light of the light of the police officers at the time. However, the light of the light of this, other than the light of the light of the light of the police officers, he or she provided the above information to the above male and female police officers with the light of the light of the light of the light of the police officers at the time.
Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the Defendant, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;
B. On August 1, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, a certificate of certification (agreement) stating that the defendant does not want to be punished is submitted.
(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;