1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company established on June 3, 1965 and engaged in the manufacturing and selling business of electronic machinery and appliances. 2) The Defendant is a public corporation established pursuant to the Korea Gas Corporation Act with the aim of contributing to enhancing convenience in the lives of citizens and improving public welfare by laying the foundation for the long-term supply of gas.

B. 1) The bidding method for the purchase of a non-static power plant (UPS) is a non-static power plant (Unn interconcrust Povey), and UPS (hereinafter “UPS”).

(2) In order to supply electricity to power plants, hospitals, telecommunications facilities, etc., and to ensure the stable supply of electricity, the Defendant is a device that supplies electricity voltage, static frequency, and high-quality electric power equipment. The Defendant’s bidding process was conducted through a designated competitive bidding process in which only the registered company of the Defendant can participate in the bidding for UBS purchase. The Defendant’s UPS tendering company’s registration was conducted every three years. The annual status of the UPS tendering company is as listed below [Attachment 1]: the current status of the registered company at the time of the registration of Defendant UPS tender for each year (the name of the company omitted) from 200 to 202, the registered company (the name of the company was omitted); the Plaintiff from 200 to 300; the Plaintiff, Mccom, Macom, 2003 to 205; the Plaintiff, Mccom, the 2006 to 208 to 2008 to 209 to 200, the international telecommunication industry, the international telecommunication industry (the Plaintiff, etc.).

(2) From 2012 to 2014, the Plaintiff, Mascom, ASEAN, the New Engineering, the International Communications Industry Electronic Commerce, the International Telecommunications Industry, the Large Agriculture Industry, the Magma Electricity, and the International Electricity (hereinafter “Plaintiff et al.”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff et al.”)

(2) From 200 to May 2013, 2013, the Defendant determined the company that participated in the bidding as the successful bidder at the lowest price below the estimated price.

The estimated price shall be the price survey or.