1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company established on January 25, 191 and engaged in the manufacture, sale, etc. of the power-driven system. 2) The Defendant is a public corporation established pursuant to the Korea Gas Corporation Act for the purpose of contributing to the enhancement of convenience in the lives of people and the enhancement of public welfare by laying the foundation for the long-term stable supply of gas.

B. 1) The bidding method for the purchase of a non-static power plant (UPS) is a non-static power plant (Unn interconcrust Povey), and UPS (hereinafter “UPS”).

(2) In order to supply electricity to power plants, hospitals, telecommunications facilities, etc., and to ensure the stable supply of electricity, it is necessary to supply power plants, hospitals, and equipment. The Defendant’s bidding process was conducted through a designated competitive bidding process in which only the registered companies can participate in the bidding for UBS purchase. The Defendant’s UBS bidding bid agent’s registration was conducted every three years. The annual status of the UPS tender agency is as listed below [Attachment 1]. [Attachment 1] The current status of the registered companies at the time of the registration of Defendant UPS tender for each year (hereinafter “stock company” in the name of the company), from 200 to 202, the registered companies (hereinafter “registered companies”) are as listed below: beercom, EPS industry, EP Industries, ASEAN, 3, 2003 to 205 to 305 to 205 to 30 years from 200 to 30 years from 200 to 30 years from 208 to 200 years from 10 years from the International Industries industry.

) From the year 2012 to the year 2014, Mascom, Ethical Industries, ASEAN, the Plaintiff, the international telecommunication industry, the international telecommunication industry, the international telecommunications industry, the large farm industry, the stoma electricity, the stoma electricity, and the international electricity (hereinafter “Plaintiff and other eight companies”).

2) From 200 to May 2013, 2013, the Defendant determined the company that participated in the tender as a successful bidder (the lowest price below the estimated price).

The estimated price shall be.