beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 03:00 on Nov. 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened a string door, which was parked by the victim D; (b) opened a e-learning car parked by the victim D; and (c) cut off three 100,000 won at the market price of the new bank, which was located in the victim’s front of the said car; (d) one copy of the credit card and two points card; and (e) one copy of the 100,000 won at the new bank, which was located in the front of the said car; and (e) three copies of the USB, the market price of which is unknown.
2. Fraud by using computers, etc.;
A. At around 03:51 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) sold gasoline to the G gas station located in the Gumi Si F, 03:51 on the car owned by the Defendant; (b) passed a stolen credit card to the credit card settlement machine, which was attached to a primary abandonment without the authority of the Defendant, and (c) paid KRW 40,000 of the paid-in profit.
B. At around 03:56 on the same day, the Defendant acquired pecuniary profits equivalent to the same amount by settling the amount of KRW 3,350 by using the credit card of the above new bank in the same manner at the gas station.
3. The Defendant, at around 04:35 on the same day, purchased goods, such as Chicago tobacco 1 sheet, etc. from an IE in the Gu and America, and received from the victim, who was the cause of the fraud, a delivery of goods equivalent to the same amount of money, namely, from the victim, by deceiving the victim and settling the sum of KRW 33,800, by suggesting that the credit card of D stolen credit card was completed as the Defendant, as seen above, from the victim J.
4. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, at around 04:31 on the same day, purchased two LeinOK, an engine additives, and paid KRW 212,200,00 in total with D’s credit card by deceiving and thefting the victimJ by the above methods. However, immediately thereafter, the Defendant’s erroneous calculation of the price for the fuel of the engine additives at around 04:48 on the same day.