logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.11.24 2018가단9880
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 31,776,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from July 15, 2016 to November 24, 2020 for this.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From September 2015, the Defendant, who sells clothes with the Plaintiff’s salary supply and the Defendant’s price payment 1) “C”, requested the Defendant to provide the Plaintiff who conducts the clothing manufacturing business under the name of “D”, and to provide the string process. Accordingly, around September 2015, the Plaintiff supplied the Plaintiff with the 410 strings and 414 strings and 814 strings, and around October 15, 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 1,855,000 at the Defendant’s discretionary processing cost. 2) In other words, the Plaintiff supplied KRW 1,85,000 at the Defendant’s request on October 27, 2015, and the Defendant paid KRW 600,00 for the 2nding processing cost.

3) Around November 2015, the third-lane Plaintiff supplied KRW 7,00,00,000 each, at the Defendant’s request, of KRW 7,50,50,500 from April 8, 2016 to July 14, 2016; the Defendant supplied KRW 7,562,500,000 on December 7, 2015; and the Defendant supplied KRW 7,800,00 on April 27, 2016; (b) the Plaintiff supplied KRW 30,00 from April 8, 2016 to July 14, 2016 to the Defendant at his request.

2) On October 10, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on the ground of the unpaid fraud of processing costs. On the part of the Defendant, the Defendant was investigated by the Seoul Southern Police Station, and the Plaintiff was produced in bad faith while recognizing the fact that the Plaintiff made and supplied the clothing as above, and the Defendant was sold to retail through the Internet Open Market, but the Defendant did not sell the clothing but did not pay the purchase price. On December 28, 2017, the Prosecutor issued a disposition against the Defendant “no suspicion of suspicion (Evidence of Evidence)” against the Defendant. [Grounds for Recognition] In the absence of dispute, the Defendant stated each entry including the number A, Nos. 1 through 11, and Nos. 1 through 5 (Evidence of Evidence), as the result of the Defendant’s personal questioning, the purport of the entire arguments, as a whole, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

(a) above;

arrow