A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, the Defendant dealt with the following psychotropic drugs-related mailculpers (hereinafter referred to as “culphon”).

1. The Defendant, through B, intended to purchase chophones from sales in the name omitted (BD: “C”; hereinafter “C”) through B; around June 29, 2018, at the E Bank F Hospital Branch in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, “C” transferred KRW 400,000 to the virtual account in the name of the E Bank Account in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, using the H’s personal information; and around that time, the Defendant sought approximately 0.5g of the chophones concealed by the housing in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, with “C” at the bottom of the event.

2. Medication of phiphones.

A. At around 03:00 on June 29, 2018, the Defendant administered approximately 0.1g of phiphonephonephones purchased as prescribed in paragraph (1) from K of the J Building in Gyeonggi-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do.

B. At around 02:00 on September 14, 2018, the Defendant administered “M” L in Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, in a way that diversculous diaphones (ordinaryly once medication, 0.03-0.1g) were injected into the bloodline with a single-use injection instrument by dilution with aquatic divers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written appraisal of narcotics;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc., concerning the relevant criminal facts and the Selection of Punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the crime related to narcotics, etc. for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act should be punished strictly in light of its social harm, considering the favorable circumstances that the defendant has no same criminal records, purchase, and the number of medication is less than the number of times, and that the defendant would not repeat again, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc. and the arguments of this case are recorded.