logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.11 2017누56317
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

This court's reasoning is as follows: (a) Nos. 2 and 3 of the first instance judgment "Visa exemption (B-1)" is "B-2"; and (b) Nos. 3 and 4 of the third part of the first instance judgment as "no. 20 through 4 of the third part of the first instance judgment shall be deemed to exist to the extent that they have caused fear from the point of view of a person who is injured by race discrimination or suspicion against a foreigner in the South Africa; (c)" and (d) Nos. 3 and 12 of the third part of the first instance judgment as "no. 5 through 8 of the third part of the first instance judgment (including the number of pages) submitted at the court of the first instance" are the same as the written reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the addition of "no. 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main part of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act."

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow