beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay 157,158,000 won to the plaintiff.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.
3. Of the costs of lawsuit.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff’s technical proposal and performance guarantee 1) The Defendant submitted the Plaintiff’s technical proposal and performance guarantee 1) the total human treatment facility installed at the old sewage treatment site on March 201 means the total quantity of persons included in water speed as one of the indexes indicating dystrophy (melting and red tide) such as rivers, lakes, etc. The total quantity of water treatment facilities means sewage treatment facilities to lower the concentration of pollutants, such as the total quantity included in discharged water. The public notice was given to guide the submission of technical proposals. Of the guidelines for preparing technical proposals attached to the public notice, the following are written in the column for the preparation of technical proposals attached to the public notice:
B) The credibility test for performance guarantee shall be continuously driven for at least 30 consecutive days on the basis of the design guarantee provided by the public driving company within three months of the trial run. (c) The public driving company is informed that it is responsible for the scope of the guarantee even in the case of operating and managing the operation of the local government and the private disposal of privatization when it flows within the scope of the inflow water change (high density or low concentration) presented by the public driving company.
2) On March 28, 2011, the Defendant submitted a technical proposal and a sex certificate to the Plaintiff on March 28, 201. The details of the planned water quality in the technical proposal are as follows (Evidence No. 12). The planned water quality in the technical proposal 3.1): Biological oxygen demand, COD demand, chemical oxygen demand, COD: Total nitrogen, T-N: Total nitrogen, T-P Non-P Non-P Non-P-P Non-P-P-P-P-P-P-P-2 on October 6, 201. The content of the proposed water quality in the technical proposal is as follows (Evidence No. 12: 10.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. or less than 0.0.50.0.0. 20. 20. 50. 10. 50. 15. 10. 205. 205. 20. 0. 0. 5. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 2. 0. 0.