logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2014.01.21 2013고단178
위증교사등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B, C, and D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000, and Defendant E shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 178]

1. On June 2, 2010, Defendant A is a person who won the election at the 5th election of the Do local election of Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do.

Defendant

A had been about KRW 70,000 (one day, KRW 70,000 per day, KRW 10,00) in return for election campaign to C, B, and D, who had been engaged in election campaign as volunteers through K, and L during the election campaign period.

In this regard, in November 2010, the Ma Office of the former District Prosecutors' Office was investigated into the above issues, and as a result of the investigation, K and L were indicted as a violation of the Local Education Autonomy Act with the previous District Court M support around November 30, 2010 and tried.

At the time, the Defendant knew that C, B, and D received money in return for an election campaign from K and L was summoned as a witness and witness in the above investigation and trial, and asked C, etc. to make a false statement to the effect that such C, etc. was “no money was received in connection with an election campaign” and requested C, etc. to make a false statement on several occasions from October 201 to January 7, 201.

On October 7, 2010, the Defendant asked to the effect that the aforementioned C, B, and D were to make a false statement of having no money. Moreover, from December 31, 2010 upon receipt of the witness summons of the instant case, C, B, and D, the Defendant asked C, B, and D to the effect that the said C, B, and D were present and testified as a witness at the said court on the same date as of January 7, 201, and requested them to the effect that “the said C, B, and D did not receive any money in the court,” and made a false resolution on the testimony of the said C, B, and D on several occasions, and following the above request to the effect that “the said C, B, and D were to make a false statement of the fact that they did not receive any money in the court,” and according to the resolution, the Defendant requested C, B, and D to make the said testimony as a witness of the said case at the court branch of M&D No. 105 of the instant case.

arrow